From Acronyms to Action at IEEE-IAS/PCA Cement Conference 2025 By Molly Pace, Cement Economics & Implementation Engineer at Imubit If there’s one thing the Cement Industry doesn’t lack, it’s acronyms and challenges. Each year, the IEEE-PCA (now ACA) Cement Conference highlights the latest technological innovations while also surfacing persistent industry frustrations. This year’s event was no exception, there were three abbreviations that dominated hallway conversations at this year’s IEEE‑IAS/PCA (now ACA) Cement Industry Conference. With more than 1,200 delegates and 450 companies on‑site, the gathering showcased an industry eager to modernize, yet honest about the practical obstacles that still stand between ambition and execution. From Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Alternative Fuels (AFR), and the ongoing shift to Portland Limestone Cement (1L), the conference floor buzzed with new tools, strategies, and solutions. But alongside came a familiar undertone of operational struggle. Despite the abundance of cutting-edge displays, many attendees voiced continued frustration with the pace of progress in plant modernization and the road toward 1L adoption across North America. Here are the key takeaways: The Road to Net Zero is a Complex Network of Parallel Paths The cement industry has a lofty goal of net zero by 2050 which is no easy feat. The sector’s commitment to carbon neutrality framed nearly every session. Producers recognize that incremental tweaks will not close the emissions gap quickly enough. Speakers argued for integrated programmes that link kiln upgrades, alternative fuels, and data‑driven optimization into one investment narrative that finance teams can support. AFR Will Help, Once We Acknowledge and Accept the Realities Alternative fuel and raw material (AFR) adoption is advancing in the cement industry, but plant managers outlined a familiar set of internal and external hurdles: Current equipment constraints and CAPEX allocation for feeding-system retrofits Competition with landfills, which offer the cheaper disposal route without incentives Ever evolving legislation that varies by state, province, or country Variable feedstock quality and concerns about long-term fuel availability Process control complexity that threatens product consistency Consensus amongst event attendees was that solving these hurdles will involve blending a mix of technology solutions with cross-functional governance. Companies will need to align teams around a single shared view of emissions and economics that links procurement, environmental, and site operations. Portland Limestone Cement (1L): Logistics Over Chemistry The transition toward Portland Limestone Cement (PLC or 1L) continues to gain momentum, having proven a >10 % carbon‑intensity reduction. Technical debates about strength development are waning, but they’ve opened the floor for discussion on the next hurdle: logistics. Fine limestone sourcing, silo space, and market acceptance are challenges all producers are facing. Speakers advocated for coordinated rollouts that synchronize production, distribution, and specification updates. AI Has Evolved: From Predictive Maintenance to Closed Loop Optimization Artificial intelligence is more than just a buzzword, it’s already hard at work in cement plants through predictive maintenance systems. These AI-driven tools analyze sensor data, equipment performance trends, and historical failure patterns to forecast when parts will need replacing and where costly breakdowns might occur. This proactive approach has become essential for improving plant availability, reducing downtime, and optimizing maintenance budgets. But what if there was a way to shift the focus from simply understanding when things will fail to truly understanding all interactions of variables in your specific process? Once you understand all of these complex, dynamic, and nonlinear variable relationships, the realm of possibility for how you can leverage your data broadens. Culture, Capital, and Continuity Remain Key Organizational Challenges Presenters returned to a recurring theme: the cement industry’s challenges are as much organizational as technological. Winning budget for decarbonization requires a narrative that aligns cost savings with sustainability benefits, while talent pipelines must cultivate “translator” roles that bridge process engineering and data science. In a sector where kiln uptime is paramount, change initiatives succeed only when they enhance—rather than disrupt—stable production. An Action Plan Powered by Technology, Process, and Your People The road to 2050 will be achievable with the right discipline and investments in smarter fuels, smarter data, and smarter collaboration. Imubit’s approach to Closed Loop AI Optimization (AIO) starts with the real plant data—from all operating modes, all feedstocks, all AFR substitutions. It pushes towards your defined objectives, whether you’re looking at margin or emissions. And it brings members from historically siloed teams together around a single model of plant reality. Imubit’s Optimizing Brain™ Platform reveals what operators are unable to see. The chart below highlights how our models can detect and learn complex, nonlinear relationships between variables, for example calciner inlet temperature and alternative fuel rate. It can recognize subtle shifts in operational data that would otherwise go unnoticed or unmeasurable. Figure 1. Imubit gain histograms highlight nonlinear process variable relationships indicating a flip from a negative gain (red) to a positive gain (blue). This is particularly valuable in the context of AFR, where the interplay of combustion and material variability is difficult to quantify. By training on plant data, our models don’t replicate what we already know, it uncovers what we don’t. When you’re ready to see how AI can be leveraged to help push your unit to the highest economic state while balancing your 2050 emissions objectives, our team is ready to engage with your complimentary AIO Assessment.

Manufacturing leaders today face a pressing challenge: a growing skills gap that threatens the competitiveness and growth of their operations. According to a recent Deloitte study, the U.S. manufacturing sector alone could face a shortage of up to 2.1 million skilled jobs by 2030, with unfilled roles potentially costing the economy $1 trillion by 2030. The rapid rise of Industry 4.0 technologies including automation, robotics, AI, and data-driven processes, is reshaping the skills required in front-line operations. Traditional workforce development and training programs struggle to keep pace with these changes. The result is a widening divide between the capabilities your current workforce holds and what future operations demand. The generation that is retiring now will take decades of invaluable institutional knowledge with them. At the same time, manufacturing requires employees adept at navigating complex digital systems and AI-enabled tools that didn’t exist even five years ago.  The key to remaining competitive lies not just in recruiting new talent but in fundamentally rethinking how organizations develop, retain, and optimize their workforce in this evolving environment. To address this challenge, manufacturers need a structured and strategic response.  This article outlines a practical five-step framework to help close the skills gap and future-proof workforce development efforts: Diagnose current and future capability needs, Design a skills framework aligned with Industry 4.0, Recruit diverse talent through modern pipelines, Upskill existing employees with targeted training, and Measure progress to refine and scale what works. This approach gives process industry leaders a clear path to align talent strategies with digital transformation goals, positioning AI not just as a tool for optimization, but as a key enabler of personalized learning and knowledge sharing. 5 Steps To Address The Skills Gaps To keep pace with evolving manufacturing demands, you need more than reactive hiring. Your workforce strategy must be proactive, focused on continuous development aligned with new technologies. Here is a roadmap to transform your manufacturing talent pipeline and workforce capabilities. Step 1: Diagnose Your Workforce Gap The foundation of any effective workforce strategy is a clear understanding of the current state. Begin with a thorough diagnosis of where your skills stand today and what gaps exist relative to future technology requirements. Use multiple data sources to build this picture: HR Data: Review existing qualifications, certifications, and performance data. Supervisor Feedback: Conduct structured interviews to gather insights on team readiness and skill gaps. Self-Assessments: Have employees rate their comfort with emerging skills like robotics operation or data analytics. Then, map these findings against your anticipated future needs. This includes competencies in AI-driven decision-making, advanced robotics, predictive maintenance, and data literacy. For example, a maintenance technician once focused on mechanical fixes now must analyze predictive analytics data to prevent equipment failures. A simple gap analysis table can clarify priorities: Here’s a simple example of how a gap analysis might look in text form: Role: Maintenance TechnicianCurrent Proficiency: 3 out of 5Future Need: 5 out of 5Gap Size: 2 Role: Production SupervisorCurrent Proficiency: 4 out of 5Future Need: 4 out of 5Gap Size: 0 Be sure to consider soft skills alongside technical ones. Adaptability, teamwork, and communication are crucial in fast-evolving manufacturing environments. When addressing workforce skills gaps, it’s important to watch out for common pitfalls that can derail your efforts. Overreliance on manager perceptions without gathering direct input from employees can distort your understanding of true skill levels. Ignoring soft skills such as adaptability, communication, and teamwork can create future friction, especially in increasingly digital environments. And relying only on lagging indicators, like past performance data, may leave you blind to upcoming gaps, making it harder to take timely, proactive measures. Step 2: Design a Future-Ready Skills Framework Once you know where the gaps lie, translate this into a practical development framework. Create competency matrices that define specific, measurable learning outcomes for each skill at varying proficiency levels. The focus should be on modular, stackable learning paths. Employees benefit from smaller, focused learning modules that build toward broader certifications. This approach fits better with production schedules and adult learning principles than long, one-size-fits-all programs. Include: Technical skills: AI literacy, robotics, data analysis Soft skills: Problem-solving, communication, teamwork Certifications: Industry standards and safety compliance Involve subject matter experts, frontline operators, and union representatives (if applicable) early to ensure content is relevant, practical, and accepted. AI can enhance this framework by powering adaptive learning tools that personalize content based on individual progress, making training more effective and engaging. Step 3: Build Recruiting & Talent Pipelines Addressing the skills gap isn’t just about training existing workers. Building sustainable pipelines for new talent is essential, especially as manufacturing careers evolve. Effective recruiting strategies include: Apprenticeships and work-study programs that combine classroom and on-the-job learning. Targeted diversity initiatives, such as women-in-manufacturing programs and veteran reintegration. Partnerships with universities and community colleges focused on STEM and technical skills relevant to your operation. These efforts help correct outdated perceptions of manufacturing as “low-tech” work by showcasing high-tech opportunities and clear career advancement paths. Use data to monitor pipeline health and diversity metrics. Track: Number of candidates sourced from each channel Conversion rates to hires Diversity composition of applicants and hires Retention rates by source A well-managed talent pipeline ensures your workforce grows sustainably and adapts to technological changes. Step 4: Upskill & Reskill With Industry 4.0 Learning The core of workforce development in manufacturing today is upskilling and reskilling your existing employees with Industry 4.0 skills. Modern training blends traditional classroom methods with digital tools: E-learning modules for flexibility Simulations for safe, immersive practice AI-powered adaptive learning platforms that customize content and pace AI-based training tools can shorten onboarding and skill acquisition times by identifying knowledge gaps in real time and tailoring lessons accordingly. This approach preserves critical institutional knowledge as experienced workers retire. Common challenges like shift schedules, limited trainer availability, and technology access can be mitigated by: Microlearning modules that fit into workflow breaks Mobile-friendly platforms accessible on tablets and smartphones AI-assisted coaching supplementing human trainers Many workforce development grants and incentives are available to offset training costs, making such initiatives financially feasible. Step 5: Measure, Iterate, Scale Measurement is essential to understand the impact of your development efforts and guide continuous improvement. Track key performance indicators (KPIs) such as: Time-to-competency for new hires and reskilled workers Training ROI based on productivity improvements and reduced error rates Internal fill rate for skilled roles, reducing reliance on external hiring Employee engagement and satisfaction with training programs Create dashboards that provide visual summaries by site, role, program, and time intervals. This multi-dimensional insight supports timely decision-making and resource allocation. Future-Proofing Workforce Development With AI To stay competitive in the Industry 4.0 era, manufacturers must do more than adopt new technologies. They must also empower their people to evolve alongside them. Sustainable workforce development depends on a culture of continuous learning. This includes regular training refreshers, job rotations, and shadowing opportunities that keep employees adaptable and engaged. But as production processes grow more complex and digital, traditional training approaches alone are no longer enough. AI-enabled learning tools are transforming how organizations develop talent. These solutions personalize training journeys, dynamically adjust content to match evolving operational demands, and help preserve critical institutional knowledge especially as experienced workers retire. At the same time, forward-thinking manufacturers are embedding digital literacy and sustainability skills into their development frameworks to stay ahead of industry demands. Closing the skills gap requires a structured approach: diagnose current and future skill needs, design the right framework, recruit from diverse talent pipelines, upskill existing teams, and measure progress consistently. Imubit supports this transformation going beyond technology for process optimization to a platform and processes that strengthen workforce development. By generating real-time insights and supporting adaptive learning, Imubit helps process industries future-proof both their operations and their people. Ready to close the skills gap and future-proof your workforce? Start with a free AI-value assessment tailored to your plant. Discover how Imubit’s technology can help align your talent strategy with operational goals, empowering both your people and your performance.

The process industries face a defining moment. Across manufacturing plants, refineries, power stations, and chemical facilities, a wave of experienced plant operators is nearing retirement. As much as 25% of the industry’s workforce is expected to retire within the next five years. This demographic shift threatens to drain plants of deep operational knowledge built over decades-long careers, creating both a skills gap and an urgency to modernize operations. At the same time, AI and automation are becoming integral to modern plant operations. AI is not just reshaping equipment performance and maintenance; it is fundamentally changing how operators interact with complex systems. This convergence of a retiring workforce and advancing technology creates a dual challenge. Plants must preserve critical institutional knowledge while equipping new operators with skills relevant to an increasingly AI-driven environment. It is important to understand that AI should not be viewed solely as a disruptor or a replacement for human expertise. Instead, it is a powerful enabler, one that can bridge knowledge gaps, enhance operator decision-making, and accelerate training effectiveness. The future of plant operator training lies in combining traditional experience with AI-augmented learning methods. This article examines five key ways AI is transforming the training and retention of process industry operators. From establishing structured learning roadmaps to integrating AI-driven simulators, these strategies offer a practical blueprint for developing the workforce needed for future autonomous operations. Moving From Fundamentals To AI Readiness The industrial workforce needs comprehensive preparation for an AI-integrated future. This reflects the reality that traditional training focused solely on mechanical and process skills no longer suffices. Today’s plant operators require a clear, systematic pathway that begins with foundational knowledge and advances toward digital fluency and AI competence. A practical approach to preparing operators involves a structured five-step roadmap: Assess The process starts with a thorough evaluation of the current workforce’s skills and knowledge. This assessment should measure both traditional technical expertise and digital readiness. For example, operators might excel in troubleshooting but lack experience interpreting data from AI-based analytics systems. Build Core Skills Once gaps are identified, reinforce essential competencies such as safety protocols, compliance standards, and process fundamentals. Operators need a solid foundation before layering on new technologies. Layer AI Competencies Introduce AI concepts, data literacy, and analytics in manageable increments. Operators learn to interpret AI recommendations and understand the algorithms that support operational decisions. Validate With Certifications Formal credentials remain critical. Training programs should include both industry-standard certifications and newer digital badges that recognize AI-related skills. Optimize & Measure Establish metrics to track learning outcomes and correlate training effectiveness with operational performance, such as reduced downtime or improved safety records. Reinforcing Core Technical & Safety Skills While AI introduces new capabilities, certain fundamentals remain absolutely essential. The core technical and safety skills are the backbone of plant operations and are non-negotiable regardless of technological change. Safety and regulatory compliance training remains the first line of defense. Operators must master procedures like lockout/tagout, hazard communication, confined space entry, and regulatory basics. These protocols safeguard lives and the environment and are not replaceable by AI. Automated systems may assist, but the operator’s judgment in emergency situations remains critical. Scientific understanding of process fundamentals provides essential context. Working knowledge of thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, heat transfer, and unit operations helps operators interpret process behavior and evaluate AI-generated recommendations critically. For example, if an AI suggests adjusting reactor temperatures, an operator versed in the reaction kinetics for their particular unit can assess the operational feasibility and risks involved. Equipment and maintenance expertise complement AI-driven predictive maintenance. Understanding how pumps, valves, boilers, and instrumentation function enables operators to diagnose equipment issues effectively. While AI may predict failures by analyzing vibration or temperature data, the operator’s mechanical insight guides corrective actions and root cause analysis. Ultimately, AI enhances but does not replace the core competencies that keep plants running safely and efficiently. Integrating New-Era Competencies: Data, Analytics, and AI Traditional operator training programs often overlook the digital skills required in modern plants. Yet, AI and automation demand a new skill set that blends process knowledge with data literacy and cybersecurity awareness. Three key emerging competency areas define this new era: Data Literacy Operators must understand how data flows through control systems, how sensors work, and how to work with their engineers to interpret trends and anomalies. Interpreting AI Outputs AI systems provide recommendations but can have limitations or errors. Operators need the critical thinking skills to evaluate AI alerts, such as distinguishing genuine equipment anomalies from sensor drift or false positives. Cybersecurity & Ethics As operational technology (OT) networks become more connected, operators must be aware of potential cyber threats. Understanding the ethical implications of AI decisions is also crucial, especially when automated recommendations could affect safety or environmental compliance. For example, an AI-powered anomaly detection system may highlight unexpected behavior in steam generation. The operator’s ability to verify this alert and decide on corrective steps directly impacts reliability and safety. Although some process technology curricula now include these topics, integration remains uneven. Combining these digital competencies with traditional skills creates operators equipped to work effectively alongside AI systems. Evolving Certification & Accreditation Pathways Certification and accreditation programs have long been pillars of operator qualification. However, the rapid pace of AI adoption reveals significant gaps in current credentialing frameworks. Traditional regulatory certifications such as OSHA 10/30 remain essential. These programs focus on safety and compliance and typically require regular renewal. They address foundational knowledge but rarely touch on AI or digital skills. Technical certifications bridge process understanding and equipment expertise. Examples include ISA Certified Automation Professional and process control technician credentials. These programs assess mechanical and troubleshooting skills but often lack AI-specific modules. The most significant gap lies in digital and AI certifications. Emerging credentials from industry platforms, digital twin simulation providers, and proprietary AI training programs offer badges and certificates that validate data literacy, AI system interpretation, and cybersecurity skills. Unlike traditional certificates, these often require continuous learning and frequent updates to keep pace with technology changes. This evolving certification landscape challenges organizations to combine traditional credentials with new digital qualifications. Doing so ensures operators meet regulatory requirements while gaining competencies essential for AI-augmented operations. Learning Through Simulators AI-powered learning environments are revolutionizing operator training by providing safe, immersive, and highly tailored experiences. Digital twin simulators recreate exact plant conditions, allowing operators to practice complex procedures, troubleshoot emergencies, and interact with AI-driven recommendations without risk to real equipment. A successful AI-augmented training program follows a three-step process: Skills Gap Analysis: Identify where operators lack proficiency in AI-related tasks such as interpreting alerts or investigating anomalies. Curriculum Mapping: Design training modules that blend core technical skills with AI concepts, customized to specific plant units and processes. Pilot & Scale: Begin with select operators on critical units, measuring competency improvements before expanding across the facility. Simulations provide hands-on experience with AI tools, boosting operator confidence and accelerating readiness. Facilities using AI-powered approaches report up to a 78% reduction in time-to-competency compared to traditional training. By integrating AI into the learning process, operators become active participants in their development, fostering trust and engagement with new technologies. Implementation & Change Management Best Practices Introducing AI-enhanced training requires thoughtful execution. These best practices can ease adoption: Start with high-impact roles such as senior operators and supervisors who influence daily plant decisions and can champion the program. Use AI platforms that create risk-free environments for experimentation and skill building. Schedule cross-functional workshops bringing together operators, engineers, and maintenance staff to foster collaboration and shared understanding of AI benefits. Involve experienced operators as mentors to preserve institutional knowledge and ease the transition to AI tools. Align training goals with plant KPIs like energy efficiency, safety incidents, and equipment reliability to demonstrate business value. Upskilling For The Future Of Autonomous Operations AI is reshaping the way the process industries operate today. This shift demands a corresponding evolution in plant operator training. The five key transformations covered here form the blueprint for preparing operators to thrive in this new environment. Leaders must act with urgency. By customizing training to plant-specific needs, piloting AI-based simulators, and bridging the workforce knowledge gap before experienced operators retire, companies can build resilient, skilled teams ready for autonomous operations. Imubit is playing a part in shaping the future of operator training. Imubit’s Closed Loop AI Optimization (AIO) supports real-time decision-making while enhancing operator learning and confidence. Rather than replacing human expertise, AIO helps operators make more informed choices and adapt to increasingly autonomous systems. In this new era, training is about building a resilient, capable workforce that can thrive alongside advanced technologies. For industry leaders, the time to act is now.  Schedule your complimentary assessment today to see how AI Optimization can deliver real value, faster than you imagine.

The cement industry faces immense challenges: it contributes approximately 8% of global CO₂ emissions, and energy costs account for 30-40% of production expenses. Add to that unpredictable raw material quality and increasing environmental regulations, and you’re navigating one of the most challenging industrial landscapes today. However, there is good news. Industrial AI is delivering real results. Plants utilizing AI to optimize processes have reported a 5-10% improvement in energy efficiency and a 3-8% increase in finish mill throughput, all while maintaining product quality and reducing waste. Traditional control methods simply cannot keep up with the growing demand for sustainability and regulatory compliance. AI techniques, on the other hand, continuously analyze thousands of process variables and make real-time adjustments, offering precision far beyond human capability. Let’s dive into three ways AI is transforming cement production: reducing kiln and grinding energy use, stabilizing clinker quality, and minimizing unplanned downtime. These strategies tackle key operational constraints while boosting plant efficiency and sustainability. Cut Kiln & Grinding Energy Use Energy costs are one of the biggest pain points for cement plants, particularly in kiln and grinding operations. As energy prices rise and emissions regulations tighten, Closed Loop AI Optimization (AIO) offers a practical solution. Traditional process control systems rely on static, rule-based models, like linear model predictive control. These outdated systems use fixed condition-action rules that break down when raw material quality shifts or equipment degrades. The outcome is wasted energy, increased costs, and unnecessary emissions. In contrast, AIO utilizes neural networks that continuously monitor thousands of variables across your kiln and grinding operations, including temperature profiles, oxygen levels, fan speeds, and material flow rates. Unlike traditional systems that merely suggest changes, AIO takes real-time action to optimize performance, ensuring equipment runs at peak efficiency despite fluctuating conditions. By learning from your plant’s historical and real-time data, the system identifies optimal operating states. When raw materials change or equipment performance drifts, it adjusts multiple control points simultaneously, maintaining efficiency and stability in ways traditional systems can’t. Implementation Checklist To implement Closed Loop AI Optimization, follow these steps: Data Collection: Ensure your process historian is gathering high-frequency data from key control points such as kiln temperature, oxygen levels, fan speeds, and energy use per tonne. Pilot Program: Begin with a pilot on one kiln to test model performance, collecting data for 2-3 months to fine-tune predictions. Full Deployment: Once the system demonstrates accuracy and stability, extend the optimization to full operation. This technology can help manage raw material fluctuations that typically cause energy spikes, ensuring smooth and efficient operations, reducing both energy use and emissions. Stabilize Clinker Quality & Reduce Waste with Real-Time AI Control Cement production often suffers from quality issues. Raw material changes, fluctuating process conditions, and delayed lab test results can lead to compromised batches, resulting in waste and customer dissatisfaction. Real-time AI systems create “soft sensors” that predict key quality parameters like free lime concentration, lime saturation factor (LSF), and Blaine fineness in real-time, eliminating the need for delayed lab tests. These models continuously monitor thousands of process variables, such as kiln temperatures, mill power, gas readings, and feed rates, to forecast final product quality as it happens. Closed Loop AI Optimization (AIO) makes small adjustments continuously to keep quality on track. If it detects free lime levels approaching out-of-spec thresholds, it will adjust kiln temperature, residence time, or raw mix to bring everything back into the desired range. Plants using this approach report more consistent products, reduced waste, and improved customer satisfaction. By eliminating “quality giveaway” plants can increase profits by 2-5%. Implementation Steps Here’s how to implement real-time AI control: Connect Data Systems: Integrate your Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) with your process historian for a unified data foundation. Train AI Models: Train AI models on at least two years of historical data to account for seasonal patterns and different operating scenarios. Pilot Program: Test the model predictions against actual lab results before deploying the system into closed-loop operation. Monitor & Optimize: Once the system reaches an acceptable level of prediction accuracy, gradually shift to full automation, tracking the reduction in waste and energy use per ton of good cement. Slash Unplanned Downtime with Equipment Monitoring Unplanned downtime is a major cost driver in cement production. A single breakdown can result in hundreds of thousands in lost production, emergency repairs, and supply chain disruptions. Traditional maintenance methods often miss the early signs of failure, resulting in reactive repairs. Maintenance solutions powered with AI predict failures weeks in advance, reducing unplanned downtime. These systems analyze real-time data from sensors monitoring vibration, temperature, sound, motor currents, and pressures across critical assets like kilns, mills, crushers, and conveyors. By learning the normal behavior of each piece of equipment, AI systems can detect subtle changes, such as increased vibration or unusual temperature patterns, and alert maintenance teams before major issues arise. This predictive maintenance approach enables repairs to be scheduled during planned downtime, thereby avoiding emergency costs and extending the equipment’s lifespan. Unlock the Full Potential of AI in Cement Production with Imubit These three strategies using AI work together to revolutionize cement production. AI is no longer a futuristic concept; it’s a proven solution driving real results in cement manufacturing. From cutting energy use and stabilizing quality to minimizing downtime, the benefits are measurable and immediate. Imubit’s Closed Loop AI Optimization (AIO) is purpose-built to help cement plants implement these strategies at scale. Unlike traditional APC or point solutions, Imubit’s AIO delivers control across key processes, continuously adjusting to raw material variability, equipment drift, and changing operating conditions without requiring constant manual intervention. What sets Imubit apart is not just the technology, but the approach: Seamless integration with your existing control systems Minimal disruption to operations during deployment Proven ROI in high-impact areas like kilns, mills, and quality control Full operational visibility to build trust with your plant team If you’re looking to reduce emissions, cut energy costs, and improve product consistency (without waiting years for results), it’s time to explore what Closed Loop AI Optimization can do for your plant. Ready to get started? Schedule your complimentary assessment and discover how Imubit can help you transform your plant’s performance sustainably, intelligently, and fast.

By Dennis Rohe, Business Consulting Team Lead at Imubit I recently had the opportunity to discuss closed-loop AI technology in process control with Mark Venables for an article in Connected Technology Solutions. That piece – titled “Can closed-loop AI truly deliver on its promise to revolutionise process control?” – explores the bold promises of this technology and doesn’t shy away from the tough questions. I’m thrilled to see this debate happening out in the open. For those of us passionate about industrial AI, having a public forum to weigh the potential against the challenges is incredibly exciting. It means the conversation is no longer limited to conference rooms or pilot projects; it’s reaching the wider community, inviting more voices and scrutiny. In the article, I outlined how Imubit’s approach differs from traditional process control methods, and the discussion touched on everything from real-world results to concerns about scalability and trust. The very fact that an industry publication is asking “does it truly deliver?” signals that closed-loop AI has entered the mainstream discourse. This kind of transparent dialogue is exactly what our field needs to turn hype into lasting progress. Let’s look at why this conversation matters, and why now is the perfect time to have it. Why the Debate Over Closed-Loop AI Matters The article brings up the right questions at the right time. For those of us working at the intersection of AI and heavy industry, this moment signals that closed-loop AI is no longer just a niche innovation – it’s entering serious, cross-functional discussions. From early wins like Marathon Petroleum’s system-wide optimization gains, to the formal recognition by groups like ARC, to thoughtful concerns around trust and scalability – these conversations reflect real traction and real scrutiny. The technology is maturing. And more importantly, the dialogue around it is maturing too. That’s why this debate matters. It pushes us to evolve how we think about plant operations, optimization, and decision-making in the era of AI, not in theory, but in practice, and with real input from every side of the industry. It’s not just about validating the tech – it’s about evolving how we think about plant operations, optimization, and decision-making in the era of AI. For those coming from traditional process control, these conversations may bring a mix of curiosity and caution. You might be wondering: where does this sit relative to DCS, APC, or MPC? Closed-loop AI doesn’t replace those layers, it builds on them. Think of it as an adaptive layer that learns from plant behavior and optimizes dynamically, much like a highly experienced operator who never tires. And yes, if you’re thinking, “we’ve heard big promises before,” that’s fair. But what makes this moment different is the combination of real-world results, transparent discussion, and growing industry consensus. That’s why now is the right time to pay attention. Confronting the tough questions: What makes this moment exciting is that we’re not shying away from the big questions, we’re leaning into them. The article surfaces important topics like scalability, transparency, and long-term reliability, not as roadblocks, but as opportunities for shared insight and forward movement. In the interview, I emphasized the need to demystify AI and work alongside process engineers to ensure solutions are grounded and trusted. Concerns like data quality or model drift are not setbacks, they’re invitations to build better systems together. Closed-loop AI sits at the heart of a broader evolution in process control. It’s more than a new technology, it’s a shift in how we think about complexity, collaboration, and value creation. That’s why open dialogue is so powerful. By sharing what’s working, raising what’s unclear, and learning from each other, we gain the momentum to shape a more intelligent, adaptive, and scalable future for this industry. Join the Conversation The excitement around closed-loop AI isn’t just about the technology itself, but about the people driving it forward. I want to invite others in the industrial AI and process control community to join this conversation. Whether you’ve seen results, faced challenges, or are still forming an opinion, your experience matters. Your voice is part of this transformation. Let’s challenge ideas, share what works, and move the conversation forward. This public dialogue marks a pivotal moment – it means the industry is collectively deciding how we evolve process optimization and control in the age of AI. I’m optimistic and forward-looking about where this can lead. Yes, there’s hype, but there’s also genuine progress and a growing track record we can learn from. By engaging openly now, we can shape that progress thoughtfully. So let’s keep the debate alive. Let’s continue asking the hard questions and celebrating the wins. Closed-loop AI can transform process control, but only if we as a community steer that transformation together. I’m excited to be part of this journey, and I can’t wait to hear your experiences and perspectives as we push this field forward. For those interested in the original article that sparked this discussion, check out Mark Venables’ piece in Connected Technology Solutions. It’s encouraging to see such conversations reaching a wider audience – and it’s up to all of us to keep them going.

For those working at the intersection of AI and heavy industry, closed-loop AI is no longer just a niche innovation – it’s entering serious, cross-functional discussions.

The oil and gas sector is at a critical turning point. Responsible for nearly 10% of global energy-related greenhouse gas emissions, according to a McKinsey report, this industry plays a significant role in climate change. Rapid decarbonization is essential for oil and gas companies that want to stay competitive in a changing market. The urgency is clear. Investors are increasingly tying funding decisions to environmental performance. Governments worldwide are implementing stricter regulations on emissions, and carbon pricing is raising the cost of pollution. At the same time, customers and society expect companies to act responsibly. This creates a challenging environment but also a major opportunity. Firms that reduce emissions effectively can improve their operational efficiency, avoid penalties, access subsidies, and strengthen their market position. The International Energy Agency emphasizes that reducing methane emissions from oil and gas is the most impactful near-term measure to limit global warming. In this article, we explore three practical ways oil and gas companies can accelerate the energy transition. These approaches not only lower carbon footprints but also protect profitability and future-proof business operations. Establish A Reliable Emissions Baseline Before any meaningful reduction can take place, companies must understand their current emissions profile. Without a credible emissions baseline, it is impossible to identify the largest sources of pollution or measure progress over time. Many oil and gas operators still rely on rough estimates or incomplete data, leading to missed opportunities and poor reporting. Investor expectations and regulatory frameworks demand transparency. Accurate, asset-level emissions data build credibility with stakeholders and provide a clear starting point for effective strategies. Companies with solid baselines consistently outperform competitors in both emissions reductions and cost management. How To Build A Baseline Creating a reliable emissions baseline involves a structured approach with three key phases: Data Collection: Gather existing data from various sources such as SCADA systems, field logs, flow meters, and maintenance records. Where direct measurements are unavailable, use emission factors published by the EPA or industry bodies to estimate emissions. Focus on major contributors like combustion equipment, venting, flaring, and fugitive methane leaks. Calculation and Validation: Apply standardized calculation methods for consistency across assets. Use protocols such as those from the EPA or API. Compare results with industry benchmarks to identify outliers. Physical site verification and targeted measurement campaigns can help validate data accuracy. Gap Analysis and Prioritization: Compare your emissions intensity to top performers in your sector or basin. Identify the biggest gaps and prioritize reduction opportunities based on cost-effectiveness and impact. This helps allocate resources efficiently and sets a clear roadmap. Several free and industry-recognized tools can assist in baseline creation: Data Required: Facility emission factorsTool/Framework: EPA Greenhouse Gas CalculatorPurpose: Standardized emission estimates Data Required: Industry benchmarksTool/Framework: IEA Methane TrackerPurpose: Performance comparison Data Required: Leak detection protocolsTool/Framework: EPA LDAR ToolkitPurpose: Fugitive emissions assessment Data Required: Flaring and venting dataTool/Framework: World Bank GGFR DatabasePurpose: Quantifying waste gas Establishing a baseline may seem like a lengthy process, but companies that commit to a timeline often find that working with available data, combined with progressive improvements, delivers significant value and actionable insights. Focus On Methane Reduction And Energy Efficiency Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, with a global warming potential approximately 84-87 times greater than carbon dioxide over 20 years. Because of this potency, reducing methane emissions offers the fastest and most effective way to cut climate impact in oil and gas operations. Moreover, methane leaks and flaring represent a direct loss of product and revenue. Addressing these sources simultaneously improves environmental performance and profitability. With the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act introducing a methane fee starting at $900 per metric ton, controlling methane emissions also avoids substantial financial penalties. Alongside methane reduction, optimizing energy use is critical. Closed loop AI optimization (AIO) offers a scalable, cost-effective way to improve energy efficiency across complex operations without disrupting production. Two Complementary Approaches Methane Abatement This involves identifying and fixing leaks, minimizing flaring and venting, and automating processes to reduce unnecessary emissions. Modern leak detection and repair (LDAR) programs use advanced technologies such as optical gas imaging cameras and fixed methane sensors that provide continuous, real-time monitoring. These systems replace manual inspections and catch leaks early. Focus areas should include wellhead connections, compressor stations, and storage tanks, which typically account for most fugitive emissions. Automating flare control reduces routine venting, while smarter compressor operation cuts emissions from start-stop cycles. The financial benefits are immediate. Besides avoiding methane fees, captured gas can be sold, and companies may qualify for tax credits up to $1.5 million per facility under Section 45Q of the Inflation Reduction Act. Energy Optimization Using AI AI systems continuously monitor and adjust operational parameters such as heat exchanger temperatures, compressor settings, and fuel gas flows, integrating with existing control systems and maintaining operator oversight. AI technologies integrated with control systems in closed loop respond faster than human operators to changing conditions, minimizing energy waste. Operators see energy consumption reductions in refining and processing units. Since energy costs account for a significant share of operational expenses, the savings often translate into a quick payback on AI investments. Invest In Scalable Low-Carbon Technologies Methane reduction and energy efficiency bring immediate improvements. However, the energy transition demands a long-term vision focused on scalable technologies that reduce carbon intensity across the value chain. These investments are essential to maintain competitiveness as carbon pricing tightens and net-zero commitments grow. The key is balancing risk, capital requirements, and operational fit to build a diverse portfolio of low-carbon assets. Three Promising Technology Areas Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) CCUS captures CO₂ emissions from point sources such as gas processing plants and refineries and either stores the carbon underground or repurposes it. This technology is commercially viable today, with many projects operating at technology readiness levels (TRL) 7 to 9. Large-scale hubs demonstrate how multiple emissions sources can be aggregated to reduce costs through economies of scale. Tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act further improve project economics. Hydrogen (Blue And Green) Blue hydrogen is produced from natural gas with carbon capture, offering a near-term decarbonization pathway using existing infrastructure. Green hydrogen, made via electrolysis powered by renewables, is less mature but improving quickly as renewable energy costs fall. Hydrogen is valuable for industrial processes, heavy transport, and as a storage medium for renewable energy. Adoption varies by region, but subsidies and demand growth make it a strategic focus. On-Site Renewables And Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) Solar and wind installations at oil and gas facilities can reduce Scope 2 emissions by offsetting grid electricity use. This is especially effective in remote locations or terminals with predictable power demand. While on-site renewables require capital investment, PPAs offer a way to secure renewable energy without upfront costs. Using a portfolio synergy scorecard helps evaluate how these technologies complement each other and your existing operations. Factors to consider include ROI, operational integration, risk mitigation, and scalability. Investments that enable future expansion or co-benefits usually provide the highest value. Turning Commitment Into Action With Imubit The energy transition isn’t a distant goal. It’s a present-day business imperative. Companies that act early and effectively can reduce emissions, improve margins, and position themselves as leaders in a decarbonizing economy. Establishing a credible emissions baseline, targeting methane and energy efficiency, and investing in scalable low-carbon technologies are essential to staying competitive. This is where Imubit comes in. Imubit’s Closed Loop AI Optimization (AIO) technology is purpose-built for the process industries. It delivers real-time, autonomous optimization of energy-intensive operations like distillation, cracking, and reforming, resulting in measurable reductions in fuel use, emissions, and operating costs. The technology integrates seamlessly with your existing control infrastructure, making it easier to optimize emissions and energy performance without disrupting operations. The path forward is clear: Pairing domain expertise with advanced AI gives you the control and clarity needed to lead the energy transition. Imubit is here to help you turn ambition into action, sustainably and at scale. If you are ready to begin your AI transformation, start with a free AI Optimization (AIO) assessment tailored to your site.

Cement manufacturing is responsible for approximately 8% of global carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions. Within this process, clinker production stands out as the most carbon-intensive step. As urbanization accelerates worldwide, the demand for cement rises, intensifying the pressure on the industry to grow while reducing its environmental impact. The cement sector is at a crossroads. Regulatory frameworks are tightening rapidly. Investors are scrutinizing environmental, social, and governance metrics more closely than ever. Meanwhile, legacy plant infrastructure, combined with the loss of experienced operators, poses internal challenges that slow down decarbonization progress. This article explores how AI-powered process optimization is helping cement manufacturers tackle these hurdles. It offers a pathway to reduce emissions, enhance clinker quality, and realize quicker returns on investments made for sustainability. The goal is to provide readers with a clear understanding of why and how AI should be integrated into their decarbonization strategy today. Why the Cement Industry Needs a Decarbonization Overhaul Now The urgency to decarbonize cement production cannot be overstated. Clinker manufacturing accounts for the majority of emissions within the cement lifecycle. Around half of these emissions result from calcination—a chemical reaction where limestone releases CO₂—and the rest from the high temperatures, often up to 1450°C, required in rotary kilns. External pressures are mounting. Carbon pricing mechanisms are expanding globally, raising operational costs for high emitters. Governments worldwide are implementing strict emissions targets. For example, California’s SB 596 mandates a 40% emissions reduction below 2019 levels by 2035, aiming for net-zero by 2045. Simultaneously, investors increasingly require solid ESG performance to support funding decisions. Internally, the industry faces significant barriers. Many cement plants still rely on aging equipment, limiting efficiency gains without expensive upgrades. Additionally, decades of operator expertise are leaving the workforce due to retirements, creating a knowledge gap that impacts all functions, but hitting the domain of process control particularly hard. Measurement challenges such as controlling free lime content, a key clinker quality metric, further complicate optimization. Traditional control methods tend to err on the side of caution, leading to overburning of clinker and excess energy consumption just to ensure product quality. This practice inflates carbon emissions unnecessarily. AI offers a transformative solution to these intertwined challenges. It can precisely optimize kiln conditions and clinker properties in real time, reduce energy use, and preserve institutional knowledge, all while integrating with existing plant infrastructure. Fastest Levers For Reducing CO₂ In Cement Production Industry research and practical experience from AI solution providers highlight three main areas where cement producers can quickly cut emissions. Maximize Energy And Process Efficiency Traditional strategies like upgrading grinding systems or implementing kiln heat recovery technologies have long been used to improve energy performance in cement manufacturing. While these solutions remain important, the most immediate and scalable gains today come from deploying artificial intelligence to optimize processing in real time. AI-driven systems continuously monitor and analyze thousands of variables across the kiln, calciner, and preheater. These include temperature profiles, airflow dynamics, fuel feed rates, and raw meal composition. Unlike conventional control systems, which rely on fixed setpoints and slow manual adjustments, AI models learn from historical and live data to detect subtle inefficiencies and emerging trends that may go unnoticed by human operators. One of the most significant ways AI contributes is by eliminating the reliance on overly conservative setpoints. In many plants, operators keep temperatures and fuel rates higher than necessary to ensure clinker quality, building in wide safety margins to account for variability in feedstock or equipment behavior. While this protects against quality issues, it leads to overburning and unnecessary fuel consumption. AI removes this inefficiency by dynamically adapting to real-time changes. It can adjust fuel input, airflows, and retention times in response to even slight variations in raw material characteristics or operating conditions. The system ensures that combustion remains stable and efficient, burning just enough to maintain clinker quality without crossing into energy waste. In addition, AI enables plants to manage transient conditions such as feed disruptions, equipment wear, or environmental fluctuations without manual intervention. This capability ensures consistent heat distribution and more uniform clinker formation, resulting in lower energy use and higher throughput. Over time, the AI model continuously learns and refines its recommendations, driving incremental improvements that compound into substantial savings. By enabling precise, adaptive control of the pyroprocess, AI empowers cement manufacturers to reduce fuel consumption, cut emissions, and increase profitability without compromising product integrity. Slash Clinker Factor With Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs) Reducing the clinker factor is one of the most impactful ways to cut emissions in cement production. Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs) like fly ash, slag, and calcined clay can replace a significant portion of clinker, the most carbon-intensive component of cement. Each percentage point reduction in clinker use directly translates to lower CO₂ emissions per ton of cement produced. However, widespread adoption of SCMs is often constrained by the variability of clinker properties. Inconsistent composition and burning profiles make it difficult to confidently substitute clinker without affecting cement performance, especially in terms of strength development, setting times, and durability. This is where AI plays a crucial role. Advanced AI models analyze vast streams of process data in real time to understand the underlying factors influencing clinker variability. By identifying hidden patterns and controlling for variables like kiln temperature, raw meal chemistry, and combustion efficiency, AI helps stabilize clinker quality across production batches. With this consistency, plants can: Increase the proportion of SCMs in their mix designs without compromising product performance Reduce reliance on costly process corrections that are often needed to compensate for quality swings Achieve long-term clinker factor reductions that align with corporate and regulatory decarbonization targets Moreover, AI-driven closed-loop control continuously optimizes kiln operations, ensuring that the clinker is produced with minimal energy waste and optimal reactivity, further enabling higher SCM substitution rates. Fuel Switching & Renewable Heat Replacing fossil fuels with lower-carbon alternatives such as biomass, refuse-derived fuels (RDF), or even electrified heating systems is a crucial decarbonization strategy for cement manufacturers. These fuels offer significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions compared to traditional coal or petcoke. However, they also introduce new operational complexities due to their inconsistent energy content, combustion behavior, and availability. This variability can lead to unstable kiln conditions, fluctuating temperatures, poor combustion efficiency, and, ultimately, compromised clinker quality. Historically, plants have responded to these challenges by limiting the proportion of alternative fuels used, sacrificing potential emissions reductions to preserve operational stability. Artificial intelligence changes this dynamic. AI-powered control systems continuously monitor key process parameters across the pyroprocessing line such as flame shape, temperature distribution, fuel feed rates, and oxygen levels. As fuel characteristics shift (for example, from high-calorific RDF to moist biomass), the AI adjusts combustion settings in real time to maintain optimal conditions. It fine-tunes variables such as primary and secondary airflows, burner angles, and fuel injection rates faster and more precisely than human operators can. This real-time adaptability enables the kiln to handle a wider range of fuels without disruption. AI ensures that the kiln remains within its ideal operating window, protecting clinker quality and thermal efficiency, even when fuels are blended or changed frequently. Moreover, as plants progress toward electrification by using technologies like electric calciners or plasma torches, AI plays a key role in coordinating electric and thermal energy inputs. It optimizes energy usage based on demand, equipment performance, and electricity pricing, maximizing both environmental and economic outcomes. Where AI Optimization Delivers The Biggest Impact AI optimization offers core capabilities tailored to the cement industry’s decarbonization challenges. Increase Kiln Efficiency & Clinker Stability AI optimization provides real-time control over critical clinker quality indicators such as free lime content. By continuously analyzing process data, the system adjusts fuel input, airflow, and combustion settings to maintain ideal kiln conditions. This precision prevents overburning and reduces heat losses, helping to stabilize clinker composition even under fluctuating operating conditions. Plants can typically expect a 5–10% improvement in clinker production efficiency, translating directly into lower fuel consumption and reduced emissions. Reduce Downstream Energy Intensity When clinker quality is consistent, the downstream finish milling process becomes significantly more efficient. Stable mineralogy and hardness reduce the need for excessive grinding, avoiding unnecessary energy use. AI helps ensure this consistency by tightly controlling upstream variables. As a result, plants operate more smoothly, with fewer process disruptions and energy spikes often achieving a 3–8% increase in productivity and a corresponding drop in grinding-related carbon emissions. Automate Cement Mill Optimization Cement mills are highly sensitive to changes in feed composition, ambient conditions, and material properties. AI optimization systems continuously adapt operational parameters like separator speeds, feed rates, and circulating loads in real time. This ensures steady throughput and product quality, even in the face of variability. Importantly, AI helps minimize quality giveaway—the production of cement with strength levels well above specifications—which reduces energy waste and material overuse. The result is more efficient cement production with a leaner carbon footprint. Kickstarting AI Adoption In Cement Plants Adopting AI in cement operations often raises a key question: Will it work in our plant? The most effective way to overcome this uncertainty is through a data-driven, low-risk starting point. Many AI solutions begin with a complimentary site evaluation, analyzing a plant’s operational data to uncover specific opportunities for efficiency gains, emissions reduction, and cost savings. Once potential value is established, a phased rollout ensures sustainable success: Start Small: Begin with a focused pilot typically on a single kiln or grinding mill. This limits disruption while providing a clear proof of concept. Expand Gradually: As results become visible and operators gain confidence, extend the solution to additional assets and process areas. Scale Strategically: With proven ROI, scale AI-driven optimization across the entire facility or even multiple sites to unlock full enterprise value. This staged approach allows cement producers to realize tangible benefits early, de-risk technology adoption, and build internal buy-in. Why Imubit? Enabling Cement Industry Decarbonization, Responsibly Cement is essential to global infrastructure but the industry must evolve to meet rising climate expectations. Imubit empowers this transformation through AI-powered process optimization that enables plants to cut emissions without sacrificing performance or profitability. Imubit’s platform delivers measurable results: 5–10% increase in clinker output 3–8% improvement in finish mill productivity Higher uptime and process reliability More than just performance, Imubit’s AI offers transparency and explainability, so operators trust and understand system decisions. From optimizing combustion to stabilizing product quality and automating control across kilns and mills, Imubit enables cement producers to meet 2030 and 2050 climate goals profitably. Now is the time to act. Connect with Imubit’s experts today to get started with a free site evaluation.

The chemical industry is a cornerstone of the global economy, contributing approximately 8% to the world’s GDP. However, this vital sector is also the largest industrial energy consumer and the third-largest industry subsector in terms of direct CO₂ emissions. As the world accelerates efforts to combat climate change, decarbonization in the chemical industry is no longer a distant goal but an urgent imperative. Meeting ambitious 2030 emissions targets requires more than just regulatory compliance; it demands a fundamental transformation of how chemical plants operate. This shift is critical not only to meet environmental mandates but to maintain competitiveness in a rapidly evolving market landscape. Importantly, decarbonization should not be viewed as a costly obligation. With the right strategy, it becomes a powerful profit lever. A key element in this transformation is the adoption of resilient, AI-powered operations technologies. These intelligent systems can unlock new efficiencies, reduce waste, and enhance product quality, all while lowering emissions. In this article, you will learn practical steps for profitable decarbonization, see examples demonstrating real ROI, and explore a roadmap to build future-ready chemical operations. Why Profitable Decarbonization Is Possible Historically, the chemical industry has approached emissions reduction as a cost center. It’s seen as something that adds expense without direct financial benefit. The traditional assumption was that cutting emissions meant also cutting production rate. This perspective is changing. Advances in operational technologies like AI Optimization (AIO) reveal that reducing emissions often aligns with improving efficiency. Better energy management, fewer off-specification products, and enhanced process yields translate directly into higher margins. Plants leveraging AIO models have reported significant gains, including up to 20% reductions in natural gas consumption and throughput improvements ranging from 1% to 3%. These improvements are not isolated; they result from moving beyond reactive fixes toward proactive optimization. This approach uses plant-specific data to continuously fine-tune operations and eliminate inefficiencies. By embracing AI-powered technologies, chemical plants turn decarbonization from a regulatory burden into a profitable operational strategy. Five Profit-Focused Decarbonization Levers Effective decarbonization requires targeted actions that deliver measurable financial benefits. The following five levers demonstrate how chemical companies can drive profit while cutting emissions. Maximize Energy Efficiency and Heat Integration Energy efficiency remains the most direct way to reduce emissions and cost. A targeted energy audit combined with heat recovery systems can eliminate significant waste. On top of simple physical measures like steam trap inspections and pipe insulation, process optimization can yield substantial low-cost savings. AI can enhance these efforts by identifying optimal operating points that reduce total energy consumption per unit of output. For example, AI models can suggest adjustments in steam flow or furnace temperature that reduce natural gas use by up to 10-20%, often accompanied by improved yields. Minimize Off-Spec Production Off-spec production results in degraded profit margins and in some cases energy-intensive, costly reprocessing. In specialty chemicals and polymers, off-spec, or non-prime, rates are a major source of inefficiency. AI models can detect subtle process variations that cause quality issues, even in slow-sampled systems where traditional models fall short. By capturing relationships that physics-based models miss, AI helps operators have visibility into the process and maintain more consistent control. The result is a reduction in raw material waste, better product quality, and a corresponding reduction in emissions from rework. Optimize Catalyst and Feedstock Utilization Catalysts and raw materials are expensive inputs. Inefficient use due to fouling or suboptimal conditions wastes money and energy. AI-enabled closed-loop control can adjust reactor temperatures and feed rates dynamically based on real-time fouling indicators. This optimization maximizes chemical conversion rates with minimum energy consumption, often saving over $1 million annually at large sites. These improvements reduce emissions and operating costs simultaneously. Electrify and Secure Renewable Energy Shifting process heat from fossil fuels to electricity is a key decarbonization pathway. Technologies like electric boilers, resistive heating, or hybrid systems can replace natural gas-based heating. Choosing the right electrification approach depends on process temperature and pressure requirements. Securing renewable energy through long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) ensures the electricity used is clean and cost-predictable. Aim For Data-First Closed Loop Optimization Digitalization initiatives are pushing more chemical companies towards data readiness for AI.  Closed Loop AI Optimization (AIO) enables real-time, automated decisions on energy use, product quality, and yield. Implementing these AI-driven closed-loop technologies transforms decarbonization efforts from static projects into dynamic, ongoing improvements. A phased deployment is most effective. First, identify high-impact areas, then train AIO models using historical and live data. Finally, close the loop with real-time optimization and control, scaling across the plant. This approach aligns profit and emissions goals without compromise. Financing The Transition Decarbonization investments need not strain budgets. Capital stacking, combining multiple funding sources, can lower upfront costs and increase project returns. Green bonds, sustainable financing, and corporate venture capital support industrial decarbonization projects, especially those using AI-driven technology with proven ROI. Government incentives such as tax credits and grants reduce risk and improve payback periods. For instance, the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act and the EU Innovation Fund offer substantial support for manufacturing decarbonization technologies. Using internal carbon pricing helps justify investments by reflecting future compliance cost savings. Performance-based contracts with technology vendors align payment with results, further reducing financial risk. Combining short time-to-value technology projects with more capital-intensive heat integration and electrification projects ensures decarbonization efforts don’t come at the expense of profitability. Governance, Culture, and Change Management Profitable decarbonization requires more than technology. It demands organizational transformation. Establish a dedicated program with clear accountability, budgets, and key performance indicators tied to both environmental and business goals. Upskilling the existing workforce to understand and leverage AI tools bridges the capability gap. Operators must maintain human oversight to ensure safety while maximizing gains. Internal carbon pricing embeds sustainability into everyday decisions, encouraging innovation that boosts both profits and emissions reductions. Cross-functional collaboration among engineering, maintenance, procurement, and commercial teams strengthens outcomes by linking technical improvements with market strategies. Profitably Decarbonize or Risk Falling Behind Decarbonization is no longer just a compliance obligation. When approached strategically with Closed Loop AI Optimization (AIO), it becomes a core profit driver in the chemical industry. The tools and technologies exist today to cut emissions and costs simultaneously, building resilience and competitive advantage. Leading companies have demonstrated how AI-powered optimization transforms operations. The AIO Advantage: Revolutionizing Operations with Oxbow Oxbow, a global leader in petroleum coke calcination, turned to AIO to improve operational efficiency, reduce energy consumption, and support workforce development. Facing rising energy costs and the need for more advanced process control, Oxbow aimed to optimize performance, particularly within its rotary kiln operations, without large-scale capital investments. By partnering with Imubit, Oxbow achieved significant results: Yield increased by 1–3% Natural gas consumption reduced by 15–30% Full closed-loop implementation completed in just six months This AI-driven approach enabled Oxbow to uncover the true dynamics of their processes, allowing for continuous optimization and more consistent, profitable outcomes. In parallel, it helped empower a new generation of plant operators and engineers with the tools and insights needed to drive sustained innovation and growth. Turn Decarbonization Into a Strategic Advantage The path to decarbonization in the chemical industry is not just a regulatory necessity; it’s a strategic opportunity. With the right approach, reducing emissions can directly contribute to improved margins, higher yields, and long-term resilience. Imubit empowers chemical manufacturers to achieve this transformation by enabling Closed Loop AI Optimization (AIO), to help operations unlock deep process insights, reduce energy use, and accelerate profitability within a matter of months. Ready to transform your operations? Talk to Imubit’s experts and discover how your plant can achieve profitable decarbonization faster.